Thursday, January 15, 2015

Two Dead as Police Raid Terror Suspects in Belgium....

(http://news.yahoo.com/two-dead-police-raid-terror-suspects-belgium-195405277--abc-news-topstories.\


Suspects in Paris Charlie Hebdo attack killed in police raid Cherif and Said Kouachi, suspects in the Charlie Hebdo massacre, were killed Friday, January 9, 2015,  when French police raided a warehouse where the brothers were holding one person captive. A third suspected terrorist was killed by police at a Kosher grocery in Paris. Hostages at both locations were freed, but others are reportedly dead. (Yahoo News) 
 See more from the Dammartin-en-Goele hostage crisis   and our  
 other slideshows 
 on Yahoo News.
http://news.yahoo.com/two-dead-police-raid-terror-suspects-belgium-195405277--abc-news-topstories.html


























 A week right after the tragic terrorist attack in France, Belgium reported an attack targeted on them. Apparently, the police decided to round up people in a series of raids, depending on who they think would be a terrorist, intent on launching terror operations in Belgium.

"During the investigation we found that this group was about to commit terrorist attacks in Belgium," Van der Sypt had said.

And sure enough the suspects opened fire with automatic weapons at Magistrate, one of the places the raid was being held.

Luckily, no civilians or policemen were hurt. However, two of the suspects died and one was injured before being arrested by the police.

My only question I have is how did they pick out the suspects? Did they judge solely on the race? Or did they actually do a backgound check?

I thought this article related to what we discussed in class, racial profiling. Did these policemen use racial profiling? There wasn't a photo of the suspect in the article nor a name so that remains unknown. However, I am still very curious in how they picked these people out among the whole country. Since this is fresh news, there will be updates so hopefully I will get my questions answered.










Thursday, January 8, 2015

After 2 Deaths, New York City Adopts New Strategy to Protect Homeless Children...

(article: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/08/nyregion/after-2-deaths-new-york-city-adopts-new-strategy-to-protect-homeless-children.html?action=click&contentCollection=N.Y.%20%2F%20Region&region=Footer&module=MoreInSection&pgtype=article)


Living in a shelter is tough. Imagine all the harsh conditions people have to live through just to get by and see tomorrow. Its something no one should ever have to live through. Its something a child should never experience in their childhood. Childhood is all about bike riding and swinging on swings, care-free. To just think about little kids living through these environments is so hard breaking. Then, to hear that Jeida Torre, a three year old little girl was beaten to death by her step-father because she soiled her pants in the shelter home is just over the top. However this isn't only the only case. A week later after Torre's death, Linayjah Meraldo, 4, was fatally beaten at a Queens shelter. This led to Homeless services officials identifying high-risk families, stopping the problem before it can happen. In a way, if you think about it, its like the broken window theory. In recent weeks, the Department of Homeless Services has had social workers visit over 500 high-risk families at dozens of shelters to help them. In fact, the department spent about $2 million to hire 33 licensed social workers for a team that will be assigned to families in need.

I personally think that this is all worth it to help families with trouble and help them get through the tough times without having to hurt a poor innocent child. With social workers accompanying these broken families and helping them get by, we are able to stop a problem before it happens.



http://static01.nyt.com/images/2015/01/08/nyregion/SHELTER/SHELTER-articleLarge.jpg